crapy clawn forums http://crapyclawn.net/lolwords/ |
|
Hogg's Random Crap Thread http://crapyclawn.net/lolwords/viewtopic.php?t=1321 |
Page 207 of 218 |
Author: | Teaks [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: Ahaha. We'd all be fucked.
Eh, I think we'd actually be great. Look at all of our bf3 play. We're either A) Winners (with team on our collective backs), B) Hilarious, C) Only ridicule those that are collectively seen as asshats, D) Ace Squad Awesomeness, or E) all of the above.Given that any objective system like this would at a minimum require a user to click a "Like" button; I think we'd break even on a system like that (given that we regularly swap teams and such to try to keep an even game). Since most users won't even go through that much effort I see them needing some sort of "hey, you completed objectives and won the game!" kinda bonus. Including that I see us winning a lot on a system like this. Go Gabe! |
Author: | Happy [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: Quote: Ahaha. We'd all be fucked.
Eh, I think we'd actually be great. Look at all of our bf3 play. We're either A) Winners (with team on our collective backs), B) Hilarious, C) Only ridicule those that are collectively seen as asshats, D) Ace Squad Awesomeness, or E) all of the above.Given that any objective system like this would at a minimum require a user to click a "Like" button; I think we'd break even on a system like that (given that we regularly swap teams and such to try to keep an even game). Since most users won't even go through that much effort I see them needing some sort of "hey, you completed objectives and won the game!" kinda bonus. Including that I see us winning a lot on a system like this. Go Gabe! |
Author: | Teaks [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: Quote: Quote: Ahaha. We'd all be fucked.
Eh, I think we'd actually be great. Look at all of our bf3 play. We're either A) Winners (with team on our collective backs), B) Hilarious, C) Only ridicule those that are collectively seen as asshats, D) Ace Squad Awesomeness, or E) all of the above.Given that any objective system like this would at a minimum require a user to click a "Like" button; I think we'd break even on a system like that (given that we regularly swap teams and such to try to keep an even game). Since most users won't even go through that much effort I see them needing some sort of "hey, you completed objectives and won the game!" kinda bonus. Including that I see us winning a lot on a system like this. Go Gabe! |
Author: | dime [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:19 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread | ||
I bet you read the shit outta that article, King.
|
Author: | KingLoser [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
You know it. |
Author: | Teaks [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Just had this conversation on Facebook. The picture was posted (and apparently created by) a former soldier of mine. No clue who "Greg" is. "Brian" refers to me. What's wrong with America: Attachment: Firearm.jpg [ 30.57 KiB | Viewed 13882 times ] Attachment: Firearm2.JPG [ 63.77 KiB | Viewed 13882 times ] |
Author: | LiamE [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Whoa whoa whoa Tony how do you know Marissa Perna????? |
Author: | dime [ Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:16 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread | ||
luele
|
Author: | Happy [ Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
![]() |
Author: | superspck [ Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Lawl at ghosts. Well played. |
Author: | Agent_137 [ Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
lol, you should have a thread dedicated to this, happ |
Author: | dime [ Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:49 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread | ||
![]()
|
Author: | Teaks [ Fri May 04, 2012 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
ORION: Dino Beatdown http://store.steampowered.com/app/104900/ 5-player co-op survival arena aginst waves of dinsoaurs. Using guns, jet-packs, tanks, etc. With destructible environment. If this even achieves a metacritic of "it works" I'm all about a couple of 4-packs during next thanksgiving/christmas sales (when it's like $2 a copy) for a couple nights of cheap ass fun. |
Author: | Pos [ Fri May 04, 2012 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: If this even achieves a metacritic of "it works" I'm all about a couple of 4-packs during next thanksgiving/christmas sales (when it's like $2 a copy) for a couple nights of cheap ass fun. Teaks likes cheap-ass fun almost as much as he likes cheap ass-fun.
|
Author: | Agent_137 [ Fri May 04, 2012 10:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
i'll pay money for anything 5-player co-op just to end this bullshit 4-player co-op trend. |
Author: | Teaks [ Fri May 04, 2012 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: i'll pay money for anything 5-player co-op just to end this bullshit 4-player co-op trend.
The part I really like: Steam still offers it as a 4-pack. Really Gabe? It's supposed to be a 5-player game....why not change your standard model *just a little* and make it a 5-pack...
|
Author: | Teaks [ Tue May 08, 2012 6:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Quote: the game is free stfu
I hate people who post to threads made specifically for Agent to vent himself constructively into. Dammit Dime, did you not see the "AGENT'S THREAD FOR ANGER POSTS" title or the first link to it of "THIS THREAD IS FOR AGENT ONLY SO HE CAN VENT HERE"? We're trying to make Agent a happier, more well balanced individual! Since none of us are mailing him bipolar prescription meds at least let him have his forum. Please? His rages make me cry inside.
|
Author: | dime [ Tue May 08, 2012 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
multiply any number by zero you now have the number of fucks i give |
Author: | Agent_137 [ Tue May 08, 2012 7:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
i'm surprised dime not only did not respect a request, but altered it. what's next? Dogs and cats living together? anyway, tribes is cool, playing the new patch now. |
Author: | superspck [ Fri May 11, 2012 7:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Dear Mrs. Teaks: ![]() |
Author: | superspck [ Fri May 11, 2012 7:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
![]() ![]() |
Author: | Agent_137 [ Sat May 12, 2012 11:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
hahah, A+ posts, spck. could you attach those images though? instead of hotlinking? So when tumblr eventually deletes them we will still have them? my turn: A Softer World Attachment: stylepoints.jpg [ 92.85 KiB | Viewed 13780 times ] |
Author: | Agent_137 [ Sun May 13, 2012 2:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Teaks, is this maxim #2 how it works IRL? Schlock Mercenary Attachment: schlock20120513-a.jpg [ 161.58 KiB | Viewed 13771 times ] Attachment: schlock20120513-b.jpg [ 146.56 KiB | Viewed 13771 times ] |
Author: | Smoke [ Sun May 13, 2012 11:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Can we post in Rob's bitching thread if A) we have questions about a certain topic presented and would like it elaborated, or B) in order to bump the thread and resume Rob's bitching? I think these are reasonable requests. |
Author: | Agent_137 [ Sun May 13, 2012 11:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hogg's Random Crap Thread |
Hi. I read every post posted to these forums. you don't actually need to post in that thread to accomplish A or B. it's up to Teaks though. |
Page 207 of 218 | All times are UTC-06:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |