| crapy clawn forums http://crapyclawn.net/lolwords/ |
|
| A critique by Bonerious Jacksonious, esq (NSFW) http://crapyclawn.net/lolwords/viewtopic.php?t=2265 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | 1ucksh0t [ Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | A critique by Bonerious Jacksonious, esq (NSFW) |
Hey Boner, Please give your personal critique of 2girls1cup.com ADMIN EDIT: GOOD GABE ALMIGHTY, CLICK THE LINK FAGGOTS |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
the video dient load??? |
|
| Author: | 1ucksh0t [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.flurl.com/item/2girls1cup_Of ... o_u_279710 |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
oh my fucking god i dont think i can do it i juts watched the first bit |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
after class ill try again |
|
| Author: | 1ucksh0t [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
be strong bonerius, a little part of you may die, that is the weakness, you will naturally become stronger. We await your review. |
|
| Author: | dime [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
JESUS TITTYFUCKING CHRIST, DO NOT WANT |
|
| Author: | 1ucksh0t [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
|
|
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ok here goes In the masterful modern work 2girls1cup, the feminist genre is reexamined through a series of reversals of expectations. The prevalent ideologies of our culture are filtered through the lens of the pornographic genre - and, in true modern form - the work tends to raise more questions than it answers. The opening image, that of the stenciled "MFX 1209" suggests a confusing misunderstanding - the 1209 seems as some sort of date, yet the aesthetic of the number lends itself to a futuristic association. This blurring of past and future, mixed with the confusion of the assumed-to-be acronym primes the audience for the confusion to come. The first image with the two primary characters (who, for the sake of this reading, I will consider to be the "2girls" that are referred to in the title) is seemingly innocuous - the cross-cultural, lesbian interaction defines the equal-rights (both feminine and racial) within the genre of pornography. The gentle background music lulls the audience to sleep, and the timely but gradual change into the next shot at :11 goes by largely unnoticed by the audience. The eyes are immediately drawn to the "Cup" (also presumed to be that mentioned in the title), the inversion of the phallus and perhaps one of the most overarcing symbols for feminine spirituality and sexuality in antiquity. The gentle piano concerto will continue as the cup is suddenly and ironically filled with a steaming shot of fecal matter from the anus of our primary character. In this way, the masculinist, derogatory nature of the pornographic genre returns in a surprising, explosive manner. The fecal matter "penetrates" the sacred chalice, which raises a number of interesting questions. Many of these questions pertains to lesbian sexuality - is womanly love possible without the masculine grotesque? Is the pornographic genre doomed to exist within the realm of humiliating acts, even when the only participants are an innocuous 2 girls, and 1 cup? The later image of the two characters attempting to kiss through the feces of the masculine grotesque (as well as the literal feces) will only support this theme. The excited but hesitant tonguing suggests a sort of apprehension on the part of the lead characters, but by :25, any hope for redemption has been lost. This transition from playful tonguing to full fecal consumption happens as suddenly as the transition to the original defecatory act - why do these central thematic moments happen offstage? There is no dramatic dialogue, neither character gives voice to the greater internal struggles that surely must precede the decision to consume another's feces. This central thematic crux is internalized in both the characters, and thus is obscured from the audience's perception as well. This notion of blurring will evolve into a diluting and contamination of sorts by :40, where the vomit of disgust begins to obscure even the original thematic feces of the work. It is worth noting that the secondary character does not vomit into the cup (while our original character does), yet vomits directly onto the other woman. This further develops the motif of the masculine invading lesbian relationships - does one woman have a monopoly on the feminine cup, while the other woman becomes masculine, and begins to fill the role of the oppressor as she symbolically vomits down onto the kneeling lover? Even this notion isn't safe from the postmodern genre-confusion, as the roles are reversed and the other's mouth is vomited into in return. It is hard to read this work in any constructive manner, as evidenced by the final image of the piece. The characters present themselves to the audience, effectively breaking the fourth wall. The difficulties of untangling the thematic mess of the genre to find sentence are reflected in the physical mess on the characters faces. Hopefully, with further examination and daring works such as 2girls1cup, we will be able to break free of many of these domineering and ultimately oppressing ideological structures which are maintained by societal forces, genre restrictions, and our own perceptions of reality. |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
you're fucking welcome |
|
| Author: | assrott [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Uh, did you write all of that? 'cuz if so, I feel like you are owed money or something. Hogg, paypal this man some money. |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Uh, did you write all of that?
i did write that but i dont want your POOPY VOMIT MONEY
'cuz if so, I feel like you are owed money or something. Hogg, paypal this man some money. |
|
| Author: | 1ucksh0t [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Holy shit, i think that is the funniest shit i have read in awhile. +1 internets to u mr jackson |
|
| Author: | LiamE [ Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Wow. Wow indeed. |
|
| Author: | Happy [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Bones is this your original work or did you take it from SA? |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Bones is this your original work or did you take it from SA?
i posted it on there after i did this =] and my blog
|
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
howd u know |
|
| Author: | Happy [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
cuz some genmay fag called me out |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: cuz some genmay fag called me out
ya i jsut sawi was the one that posted that there lol |
|
| Author: | Happy [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
link to ur blog |
|
| Author: | Happy [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
or...could you mebbe post in the SA thread, "TO ALL YOU [M] Faggots, this shit is legit." That will shut them up |
|
| Author: | Happy [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
peace, Im going to class |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
but ya let there be no doubt about it i wrote that entire fucken thing and watched that horrible video and paused at key moments to discuss |
|
| Author: | BONER JACKSON [ Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
idk how else to prove it i could post a "real" criticism i did because it reads exactly the same way and sounds just as pretentious >:O |
|
| Author: | snackpipe [ Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I've noticed this video making waves as of late, idk what the big deal is that's been my homepage since years. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-06:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|